Patent vs Prototype: What Comes First When Developing an Invention?

In the lively sphere of innovation and inventions, two pivotal landmarks mark the journey of an idea towards its final embodiment: the patent and the prototype. Yet, like navigating a convoluted labyrinth, the question arises: which comes first?

The answer is complex, shaped by the nature of your invention, its market scope, resources at your disposal, and other factors. However, understanding each component—patent and prototype—offers a clearer path towards making the right decision at the right time.

The Power of Patents

A patent, administered by institutions like the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), is a legal tool that grants inventors exclusive rights to their invention for a specific period. It serves as a protective gear, keeping your idea safe from being used or sold without your consent. The sheer thought of having a patent induces a sense of security.

However, the patenting process is intricate and often requires a substantial investment of time and financial resources, given the cost of filing and potential legal assistance. The patent application itself calls for an utterly detailed description of your innovative concept alongside comprehensive claims about the aspects you intend to protect, instigating a demanding necessity for precision.

Companies like InventHelp can help you to file a patent application that will effectively protect your idea and make it easier for you to market your invention. InventHelp is a company that assists clients with the patenting process.

The Promise of Prototypes

On the other hand, a prototype serves as a functional or physical model of your invention. It allows for a comprehensive understanding of the design, features, and usability of the product, enabling inventors to detect and rectify any faults or shortcomings. Prototyping often illuminates scope for enhancements that can significantly amplify the effectiveness of your invention.

The process of prototyping can vary considerably in cost and complexity based on the type of product at hand. Simple inventions might require just a basic model or drawings, while more complicated ones could necessitate extensive research and development.

Navigating the Labyrinth: Patent, Prototype, or Both?

So, which should come first, patent or prototype? Optimally, one would want to build a prototype first to ensure their idea works as expected before investing in a patent. Afterwards, they could refine the prototype until satisfied and then proceed towards filing the patent application to secure their invention.

In practice, the path between patents and prototypes isn’t linear. Often, it’s a complex dance with iterations. As you discover new features during prototyping, you might need to go back to the drawing board to include these in your patent application.


In conclusion, the journey from idea to innovation doesn’t follow a one-size-fits-all path. It’s about understanding the essence of both, prototype and patents, and leveraging them strategically. With the right guidance—whether you turn to InventHelp or other resources—it’s just a matter of time before you see your innovative ideas come to fruition, powered by the perfect blend of patent protection and prototyping precision.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *